What is compliance actually costing you?

Most fintechs do not know. Their CCO knows the alert backlog. Their Head of Ops knows the headcount. Nobody adds it up. We do, in three numbers, in 60 seconds. No signup, no email, no demo.

Metric 1 of 3

Time-to-Active Customer

How long it takes from when a customer applies to when they can transact. Every day in pending review is a day of revenue you are not earning. The AgentSync Ready-to-Sell metric, adapted for fintech: revenue per customer per day, multiplied by days saved.

Conservative pilot benchmark. Ranger automates the screening, decision, and condition projection.
Annual revenue captured
--
From approving good customers sooner.
Metric 2 of 3

Compliance Investment per Customer

How many hours your team spends per onboarded customer on manual review, alerts, and SAR drafting. The line item that grows with volume unless you automate it. AgentSync's Administrative Investment metric, adapted: scale volume without scaling headcount.

Conservative. Pilot customers report 50–65% reduction in the first quarter.
Annual labor saved
--
Equal to -- FTE you do not need to hire.
Metric 3 of 3

Fines, Rework, and Vendor Costs Avoided

The money you spend on screening vendors, the fines you risk on missed alerts, and the cost of redoing onboarding that came in wrong the first time. AgentSync's Licensing/Appointment Costs metric, adapted: vendor consolidation, false-positive labor, regulatory exposure.

Sanctions, PEP, OIG, country risk, registered-agent, ICIJ, crypto threat all in one platform.
Your CCO's number. Use the figure you'd defend in a board meeting.
Annual risk + vendor cost avoided
--
Vendor consolidation + FP labor recovered + fine exposure mitigated.
Ranger benchmarks · adjustable

Don't trust our numbers? Drag them down.

These are the four multipliers Ranger applies to your inputs. They are our claims, not measurements of your program. Move the sliders to whatever you'd defend in a board meeting and the totals reflow.

Ranger's claim: false positives drop in half because every alert carries scoped context (graph hop, sanctions reason code, ICIJ tier).
Ranger's claim: half the exposure goes away when controls are auditable, regulator-readable, and dated. Drag to 25% if you're skeptical.
Industry rough average. If your alert rate is lower (e.g. consumer fintech with light TM), drag down.
A pure-text alert is ~10 minutes; a chain-walk on a complex KYB hit can be an hour. Set to your average.
What leadership hears

Total annual impact

Revenue captured
--
From days cut from time-to-active
Cost saved
--
Manual work eliminated + vendors consolidated
Risk avoided
--
Fine exposure mitigated + false-positive cost cut
Total annual impact
--
Pays for Ranger Cloud Pro in under a month.
Headcount avoided
Same dollars as the labor savings above, reframed as FTE. Excluded from the total to avoid double-counting.
-- FTE
How the value was calculated (every formula, every input)
Revenue from time-to-active
New customer applications / year--
× Daily revenue per customer--
× Days saved on time-to-active--
= Annual revenue captured--
Labor saved (manual review)
Compliance + ops staff--
× Fully-loaded annual cost--
× % of time on manual work--
× % reduction with Ranger--
= Annual labor saved--
Vendor consolidation
Annual screening + TM vendor spend--
× % of vendors Ranger replaces--
= Vendor spend recovered--
False-positive cost recovered
Alerts per year (apps × % w/ alert)--
× False-positive rate today--
× Hours per FP review--
× Blended analyst hourly rate--
× Ranger FP reduction--
= Annual FP labor recovered--
Fine and remediation mitigation
Risk-weighted annual exposure--
× Ranger mitigation factor--
= Annual exposure mitigated--
Headcount-equivalent (informational)
Annual labor saved--
÷ Cost per FTE--
= FTE you do not need to hire--

What you measure → what the CFO actually buys

Left column is what compliance teams say in their Monday standup. Right column is what the CFO says in the next board meeting.

What you measure What the CFO actually buys
Average days from application to active -- in revenue captured each year by approving good customers -- days sooner
Manual review hours per customer -- in labor freed up annually, equal to roughly -- full-time analysts you do not need to hire
Vendor stack cost -- saved annually by consolidating --% of your screening and TM vendors into one platform
Alert false-positive rate -- in analyst time recovered annually from cutting false positives roughly in half
Fine and remediation exposure -- in regulatory risk mitigated by faster, auditable, regulator-readable controls
Start free with Ranger Cloud Talk to Drew about a build
Save your numbers (optional)
Drop an email if you'd like us to revalidate these projections against your actual flow data once we have you in a pilot. No drip campaign, no calls unless you ask.
About these numbers. Estimates based on the inputs you provided and Ranger benchmarks across pilot customers. Real savings depend on your stack, volume, and program design. We will validate against your actual numbers in a 30-minute call. No pitch, no slides.